American Journal of Epidemiology 163 (11): S1. i.e. June 1st 2006 ABSTRACTS OF THE 2ND NORTH AMERICAN CONGRESS OF EPIDEMIOLOGY June 21-24, 2006 THE DEVELOPMENT OF AN EPIDEMIOLOGICAL CASE DEFINITION FOR CHRONIC FATIGUE SYNDROME (CFS). *T Osoba, S Gray, J Duffield (University of the West of England) Current case definitions for CFS are designed for clinical use and not appropriate for health needs assessment. A robust epidemiological casedefinition for CFS is crucial in order to achieve rational allocation of resources to improve service provision for people with CFS. To identify the clinical features that distinguishes people with CFS from those with other forms of chronic fatigue and subgroups. General practice data on symptoms, comorbidities and demographics of patients with unexplained chronic fatigue based on 4 CFS clinical case definitions were obtained. Cases were assigned to disease and non disease groups by an expert panel, and multivariate discriminant analysis used to identify those clinical features which assigned at least 95% of patients studied to the correct group. Sensitivity analysis assessed the impact of the clinical research definitions on ascertainment, classification and regression tree analysis, cluster analysis to identify subgroups on the basis of the clinical manifestations of their illness and a review of basis of diagnosis to assess how far GPs' diagnoses were consistent with current definitions and specialist opinion. Preliminary analyses using classification and regression tree analysis included a 10-fold cross-validation approach to prevent over fitting. Reliability by Cronbach's alpha was 0.644. Risk and classification tables showed an overall correct classification rate of 81.2%. The analyses demonstrated that the application of the combination of the 4 discriminating variables-the defacto epidemiological case-definition and pre-defined comorbid conditions had the ability to differentiate between disease and non-disease cases with CFS with 'postexertional malaise' being the strongest predictor.