Effectiveness of Exercise in Management of Fibromyalgia Curr Opin Rheumatol 16(2):138-142, 2004. Susan E. Gowans [a,c] and Amy deHueck [b] [a] Department of Rehabilitation Services, University Health Network, [b] Physiotherapy Department, Joseph Brant Memorial Hospital, and [c] Department of Physical Therapy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada Correspondence to Susan E. Gowans, Department of Rehabilitation Services, gw 1-553, University Health Network, Toronto General Hospital, 200 Elizabeth Street, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Tel: 416 340 4800, ext. 4408; fax: 416 977 1467; e-mail: mailto:sue.gowans@uhn.on.ca Abstract Purpose of Review: Exercise was established as an integral part of the nonpharmacological treatment of fibromyalgia approximately 20 years ago. Since then many studies have investigated the effects of exercise-either alone or in combination with other interventions. This review will discuss the benefits of exercise alone and provide practical suggestions on how patients can exercise without causing a long-term exacerbation of their pain. Recent Findings: Short-term exercise programs for individuals with fibromyalgia have consistently improved physical function, especially physical fitness, and reduced tenderpoint pain. Exercise has also produced improvements in self-efficacy. These effects can persist for periods of up to 2 years but may require participants to continue to exercise. Most exercise studies have examined the effects of moderately intense aerobic exercise. Only in the past 2 years have muscle-strengthening programs, in isolation, been evaluated. To be well tolerated, exercise programs must start at a level just below the capacity of the participants and then progress slowly. Even with these precautions, exercise may still produce tolerable, short-term increases in pain and fatigue that should abate within the first few weeks of exercising. Summary: Future studies should investigate the possible benefits of low-intensity exercise and test strategies that may enhance long-term compliance with exercise. Individuals with fibromyalgia also need to be able to access community exercise programs that are appropriate for them. This may require community instructors to receive instruction on exercise prescription and progression for individuals with fibromyalgia. Introduction Fibromyalgia is a condition characterized by widespread pain and pain at specific tender points.[1] Typically, individuals with fibromyalgia are also inactive and unfit.[2,3] Exercise was established as an integral part of the nonpharmacological treatment for individuals with fibromyalgia less than 20 years ago by the demonstration that patients randomized to 20 weeks of high-intensity exercise had greater improvements in fitness, tender point pain thresholds, and patient/physician global assessment ratings than patients randomized to 20 weeks of flexibility training.[4] Since then, an escalating number of randomized controlled trials have evaluated the benefits of exercise for individuals with fibromyalgia. Subsequent exercise trials have, by and large, examined the benefit of moderately intense aerobic exercise, either alone, or in combination with other interventions, such as muscle strengthening or education. Only in the past 2 years have a limited number of studies examined the effect of muscle strengthening, in isolation, for individuals with fibromyalgia. Four meta-analyses have also examined the benefits of exercise for individuals with fibromyalgia: 3 meta-analyses examined the effects of exercise in reviews with other nonpharmacological interventions[5-7*] and a recent, fourth meta-analysis focused solely on the effects of exercise.[8**] This fourth meta-analysis limited its study to exercise interventions that met or exceeded established criteria for improving aerobic conditioning or strengthening. This review summarizes the literature on exercise for individuals with fibromyalgia and highlights relevant exercise studies that have been published between January 2002 and September 2003. Effect of Exercise on Physical Function Physical function is a common outcome for exercise studies in fibromyalgia. Physical function has been evaluated in terms of cardiovascular fitness, self-reported physical function, or musculoskeletal performance (eg, muscle strength or a functional task like the sit and reach test). Moderately intense aerobic exercise has consistently improved physical function, particularly cardiovascular fitness, in individuals with fibromyalgia.[8**] Because individuals with fibromyalgia are often deconditioned and unfit, it is not surprising that aerobic exercise would improve their cardiovascular fitness. However, these gains are important since the pain associated with fibromyalgia can lead to decreased activity and deconditioning, and then deconditioned muscles make even lighter activities painful, which further reduces activity. Aerobic exercise has less consistently improved musculoskeletal function (eg, muscle strength or endurance)[8**] but this may be because aerobic exercise interventions do not meet the criteria for improving muscle strength (eg, 8-12 repetitions of an individual exercise performed 2+ times/wk, and progressed over time). Muscle strength has improved in all three studies that evaluated the effects of a specific muscle-strengthening program.[9*-11*] However, these improvements in strength were significantly different from control subjects in only one[10] of the two randomized controlled trials.[10,11*] Participants' self-reported physical function (typically the activities of daily living) has less consistently been improved by exercise.[8**] Effect of Exercise on Pain Pain is another common outcome for exercise studies in fibromyalgia. Pain has been measured as the number of tender points, the thresholds for tender points (eg, a cumulative myalgia score), and/or participants' self-reported level of pain (eg, visual analogue scales, pain diagrams, questionnaires). Although short-term aerobic exercise programs have not, with few exceptions decreased the number of tender points,[12-14] exercise has increased the thresholds for tender point pain in both primary exercise trials and in meta-analyses.[8**] These increases in tenderpoint thresholds may mean that exercise can decrease central pain perception, which is believed to be increased in fibromyalgia.[15] The effect of aerobic exercise on self-reported pain has been tested more frequently with mixed results. Self-reported pain has decreased in only about half of the existing, high-quality studies and this effect is not significant in meta-analysis.[8**] Although exercise may or may not decrease self-reported pain, it is important to note that by the end of short-term exercise programs, pain has not increased. Clinically, individuals with fibromyalgia often shun exercise because they believe it will increase their pain but exercise that is started at a level that is suitable to participants' fitness levels and progressed slowly should produce only tolerable and transient increases in pain that abate after the first few weeks of exercise. Effect of Exercise on Self Efficacy Self efficacy is the perception of an individual that he/she can perform a specific behavior or complete specific task(s).[16] Self efficacy emerged as an important outcome measure in rheumatology with the demonstration that arthritis self-management programs improved participants' self efficacy and the fact that these improvements in self efficacy were related to changes in participants' health status.[17] Self efficacy, particularly self efficacy for function, has also been improved by aerobic exercise in individuals with fibromyalgia.[18-21] These changes in self efficacy are noteworthy since higher levels of self efficacy for function and pain have been associated with improvements in physical function and mood[20] and lower levels of pain and physical impairment.[22] Effect of Exercise on Fatigue/Sleep Individuals with fibromyalgia frequently report poor sleep quality and subsequent fatigue.[1] Many individuals with fibromyalgia also have objective evidence of an arousal disturbance on electroencelographic recording during sleep.[23] While exercise is able to improve the sleep of healthy, older adults,[24] few exercise programs for individuals with fibromyalgia have had significant effects on self-reported fatigue or sleep quality.[8**] Effect of Exercise on Mood Anxiety and depression are frequently reported by individuals with fibromyalgia.[1] In healthy individuals and individuals with psychiatric disease, exercise is known to improve depression[25] and anxiety.[26] The effect of exercise on anxiety and depression of individuals with fibromyalgia has received less scrutiny than pain or function but, when assessed, the results have, with few exceptions,[10,20,27] been negative[8**]; that is, anxiety and depression did not improve in exercise participants when compared with control subjects. Types of Exercise Aerobic. A variety of aerobic activities (walking, cycling, dancing, water exercises) have been shown to be beneficial for individuals with fibromyalgia but only one study has compared the benefits of one type of aerobic exercise to another type. This study found that both exercise in a warm pool (water temperature: 93°F) and land-based walking improved cardiovascular fitness, but only pool exercises produced significant improvements, compared with baseline values, in self-reported pain, anxiety, and depression.[13] However, these differences were small in absolute size, and insufficient from a scientific or clinical perspective, to commend pool programs (which are hard to find in the community) over walking programs (which are easy for individuals to initiate by themselves). But, practically, there is a subset of fibromyalgia patients who have may be particularly suited to pool programs as an initial means of exercise: namely those who have significant complaints of musculoskeletal pain or those who fear that exercise will exacerbate their pain. The buoyancy of the water will limit the impact of exercise on weight-bearing joints and potentially limit exercise-induced pain. Also, warm, therapeutic pools, where the water temperature is 93°F or greater, have the added benefit of providing immediate treatment for any exercise-induced pain. Furthermore, although warm pools are hard to find in the community, even pools, with a water temperature of 85°F or more, will be better tolerated by individuals with fibromyalgia (who may be more sensitive to cold) than standard community pool programs, where the water temperature is lower. Anaerobic (strengthening). Several exercise studies have combined strengthening with aerobic exercise but only recently have three studies tested the benefits of strengthening in isolation.[9*,10,11*] To limit exercise-induced pain, it has been suggested that strengthening programs: (1) minimize eccentric exercises (ie, activities where the muscle is actively contracting while it is being passively lengthened (eg, contraction of elbow flexors to slow the descent of a heavy object to a table); (2) include pauses between exercise repetitions; (3) perform exercises for upper extremity muscle groups and lower extremity muscle groups in separate sessions, with at least 1 day of rest between sessions.[28] It has also been suggested that eccentric muscle work (eg, arms overhead) be avoided in other exercise programs.[28] However, we have found that even individuals who are significantly deconditioned can tolerate arm movements above their shoulders during land or pool aerobic programs if they are introduced gradually.[20] Flexibility. Stretching is an integral part of warm-up and cool-down exercises but there is no theoretical basis for stretching to be beneficial in isolation. Empirically, stretching did produce some benefits in the two exercise studies in which it was used as the control condition, but more improvements were seen in the intervention groups in both trials.[4,11*] To avoid subsequent exercise-induced pain, stretching should stop at the point of slight resistance and not produce pain.[28] In the subgroup of individuals with fibromyalgia and joint hypermobility,[29,30] greater care must be taken to avoid overstretching during flexibility exercises. But exercise per se is not contraindicated for individuals with joint hypermobility. In fact, individuals with fibromyalgia and hypermobility may show greater improvements with exercise than other individuals with fibromyalgia.[29] Exercise Intensity The first study that examined the benefits of exercise in fibromyalgia did so by comparing high-intensity exercise (heart rate of 150 beats/min for 20 to 30 minutes) to flexibility training.[4] However, high-intensity exercise is unsuitable for most individuals with fibromyalgia who are deconditioned and unfit[2,3] and subsequently, most studies have examined the benefits of moderately intense exercise (55 to 75% of age-adjusted maximal heart rate [220 minus age]). In individuals who are deconditioned and unfit, moderate intensity can be achieved with very low levels of exercise. A recent, well-designed study also demonstrated that low-intensity exercise (self-determined) can produce improvements, in multiple domains, for individuals with fibromyalgia.[27] This latter study suggests that even low-intensity exercise may be beneficial for individuals with fibromyalgia. To date, only one study has directly compared the benefits of exercise that vary in intensity. This study examined the benefits of 20 weeks of low-intensity exercise (self determined) versus what the authors termed high-intensity exercise (70% of maximal heart rate, corrected for age). In this small study, only high-intensity exercise was able to produce improvements in fitness and well being but these improvements were achieved at a cost since self-reported pain also increased for individuals enrolled in the high-intensity exercise program.[31*] While definitive dose response studies of exercise intensity are still lacking, from a practical perspective, exercise programs should start at levels just below the capacity of participants and gradually increase the duration and intensity until participants are exercising at the low end of moderate intensity for 20 to 30 minutes. Furthermore, even with these precautions, participants must be aware that they may have some, tolerable short-term increases in pain and fatigue but, if they exercise at an appropriate intensity, these symptoms should return to baseline levels within the first few weeks of exercise. Also, patients may be able to do more, with the same or less pain, after only a few weeks of exercising. These practical principles for exercise prescription are explored in more depth in several recent papers[28,32*,33*] and in a pending treatment guideline for fibromyalgia by the American Pain Society that is expected to be released in 2004. Studies that examine the benefits of exercise that vary in duration are also lacking; however, one recent study examined whether there was any benefit in performing aerobic exercise in two 15-minute bouts of home-based aerobic exercise, 3 to 5 times per week versus one 30-minute home-based exercise session with similar weekly frequency. This study found no additional benefits in fractionating exercise into smaller bouts in terms of compliance or attrition, although their definition of compliance was high (92% compliance with 3 sessions per week over a 4-week period).[34*] Exercise Setting Most of the published exercise studies in fibromyalgia studies were conducted in specialized hospital settings. However, several recent studies have had subjects exercised independently in their own homes using standardized exercise videotapes[34*] or in groups at community-based healthy living centers[35*] or YWCAs.[14] These papers are noteworthy since home and community settings have greater generalizability to the large numbers of people with fibromyalgia who seek treatment outside of a specialized setting. Long-Term Benefits of Exercise While the number of exercise studies has substantially increased in the past 10 years, fewer studies have examined the benefits of exercise beyond the exercise program; also, the follow-up periods for these studies, at 3 months[36] to 4 years,[37] have been relatively short. Follow-up studies have, typically, measured the same types of outcomes (physical function, pain, self-efficacy, mood, and fatigue) that have been used to track the immediate benefits of exercise. Generally, follow-up studies have found that gains were maintained in outcomes that showed the most consistent, immediate benefit from exercise. Thus, gains have been maintained in physical function (especially cardiovascular function[13,20,21,27,36*]), pain (especially tender point thresholds[18,21]), and self efficacy (especially self efficacy for pain[18-20]) for follow-up periods that varied, but could be as long as 2 years. Fatigue and mood, outcomes less likely to be improved by short-term exercise, are also less likely to be improved at follow-up (but see[20,38]). Exercise compliance at follow-up has also not been consistently tracked and compliance at follow-up has varied, partly because of different definitions of exercise adherence. For example, some studies have judged that individuals are adherent if they exercised once a week,[13] while other studies required individuals to exercise 30 minutes, 4 times a week to be deemed adherent.[37] However, compliance (however defined) can be as high as 50% or more, 3 to 6 months[13,19,39] or 2 years following a supervised exercise program.[38] Furthermore, to obtain long-term benefits from exercise, participants may need to continue to exercise as all three studies that have evaluated this have found a positive relation between ongoing exercise compliance (however defined) and the maintenance of exercise-induced changes in fibromyalgia. In the first study, 4 years following the end of a supervised exercise program, the four individuals who continued to exercise (30 minutes or more, 4 times/wk) had significant improvements on 6 of 8 outcomes, compared with the 11 individuals who had stopped exercising.[37] In the second study, there was a positive relationship between individuals who exercised at 3- to 6-month follow-up (30 or more min/wk) and the maintenance (yes/no) of gains in 6-minute walk distance.[39] In the third study, there was a positive correlation between minutes of aerobic exercise at 1-year follow-up and gains in 6-minute walk distance at follow-up [Gowans, deHueck, Voss et al., unpublished data]. Conclusion Moderately intense aerobic exercise is beneficial for people with fibromyalgia, particularly for improving their physical fitness and self efficacy, and reducing their tender point pain. Further studies need to address whether the benefits from low-intensity aerobic exercise, demonstrated in one well-run study, can be replicated. Muscle strengthening, in isolation, has only recently been tested for individuals with fibromyalgia and the benefits, suggested by these studies, need to be replicated by other controlled studies. Subsequent studies of strengthening should also continue to test whether strengthening, in isolation, can improve outcomes besides physical function. Follow-up studies suggest that long-term compliance with aerobic exercise will produce an ongoing benefit for physical function, pain reduction, and self efficacy. Since long-term compliance with exercise is difficult to achieve, further studies need to test strategies to enhance long-term exercise compliance for individuals with fibromyalgia. Finally, if exercise is to become a strong component of community care for individuals with fibromyalgia, individuals must be able to access community-based exercise programs that are sensitive to their needs; specifically, exercise programs that begin slowly and progress slowly. This may require specific training for community instructors regarding exercise intensity and progression although one study successfully evaluated exercise programs at community-based healthy living centers that were run by personal trainers with no previous experience with clinical populations.[35*] References: Papers of particular interest, published within the annual period of review, have been highlighted as: * Of special interest ** Of outstanding interest 1. Wolfe F, Smythe HA, Yunus MB, et al.: The American College of Rheumatology 1990 criteria for the classification of fibromyalgia. Arthritis Rheum 1990, 33:160-172. 2. Bennett R, Clark SR, Goldberg L, et al.: Aerobic fitness in patients with fibrositis. Arthritis Rheum 1989, 32:454-460. 3. Valim V, Oliveira LM, Suda Al, et al.: Peak oxygen uptake and ventilatory anaerobic threshold in fibromyalgia. J Rheumatol 2002, 29:353-357. 4. McCain G, Bell DA, Mai FM, et al.: A controlled study of the effects of a supervised cardiovascular fitness training program on the manifestations of primary fibromyalgia. Arthritis Rheum 1988, 31:1135-1141. 5. Hadhazy VA, Ezzo J, Creamer P, et al.: Mind-body therapies for the treatment of fibromyalgia. A systematic Review. J Rheumatol 2000, 27:2911-2918. 6. Rossy LA, Buckelew SP, Dorr N, et al.: A meta-analysis of fibromylagia treatment interventions. Ann Behav Med 1999, 21:180-191. 7. Sim J, Adams N: Systematic review of randomized controlled trials of nonpharmacological interventions for fibromyalgia. Clin J Pain 2002, 18:324-336. * Review included 11 aerobic exercise studies that were conducted in isolation or with other types of exercise or education. 8. Busch A, Schachter CL, Peloso PM, et al.: Exercise for treating fibromyalgia syndrome (Cochrane Review). In The Cochrane Library, Issue 3; 2002: Oxford: Update Software. ** This is the first systematic review that focuses solely on the benefits of exercise for individuals with fibromyalgia. To be included in the review, the exercise interventions had to be at or above the criteria recommended by the American College of Sports Medicine for aerobic conditioning (2+ times/week, 20+ minutes/session, and 55 to 90% of predicted maximal heart rate) or strengthening (2+ times/week, 8 to 12 repetitions of each exercise and progressed over time). 9. Geel SE, Robergs RA: The effect of graded resistance exercise on fibromyalgia symptoms and muscle bioenergetics: A pilot study. Arthritis Care Res 2002, 47:82-86. * This uncontrolled trial is one of only three studies that have examined the benefits of muscle strengthening alone for individuals with fibromyalgia. 10. Hakkinen A, Hakkinene K, Hannonen P, et al.: Strength training induced adaptations in neuromuscular function of premenopausal women with fibromyalgia: comparison with healthy women. Ann Rheum Dis 2001, 60:21-26. 11. Jones KD, Burckhardt CS, Clark SR, et al.: A randomized controlled trial of muscle strengthening versus flexibility training in fibromyalgia. J Rheumatol 2002a, 29:1041-1048. * This study is one of only three studies that have examined the benefits of muscle strengthening alone for individuals with fibromyalgia. 12. Martin L, Brant R, Nutting A, et al.: Abstract. An exercise and self management program in the management of fibromyalgia. Arthritis Rheum 1999, 42(Suppl):S341. 13. Jentoft ES, Kvalvik AG, Mengshoel AM: Effects of pool-based and land-based aerobic exercise on women with fibromyalgia/chronic widespread muscle pain. Arthritis Care Res 2001, 45:42-47. 14. Dawson KA, Tiidus PM, Pierrynowski M, et al.: Evaluation of a community-based exercise program for diminishing symptoms of fibromyalgia. Physiother Can 2003, 55:17-22. 15. Bennett R: Emerging concepts in the neurobiology of chronic pain: evidence of abnormal sensory processing in fibromyalgia. Mayo Clin Proc 1999, 74:385-398. 16. Bandura A: Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavior change. Psychol Rev 1977, 84:191-215. 17. Lorig K, Chastain RL, Ung E, et al.: Development and valuation of a scale to measure perceived self-efficacy in people with arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 1989, 32:37-44. 18. Buckelew SP, Conway R, Parker J, et al.: Biofeedback/relaxation training and exercise interventions for fibromyalgia: a prospective trial. Arthritis Care Res 1998, 11:196-209. 19. Burckhardt CS, Mannerkorpi K, Hedenberg L, et al.: A randomized, controlled clinical trial of education and physical training for women with fibromyalgia. J Rheumatol 1994, 21:714-720. 20. Gowans SE, deHueck A, Voss S, et al.: Effect of a randomized, controlled trial of exercise on mood and physical function in individuals with fibromyalgia. Arthritis Care Res 2001, 45:519-529. 21. Martin L, Brant R, Nutting A, et al.: An exercise and self management program in the management of fibromyalgia [abstract]. Arthritis Rheum 1999, 42(suppl):S341. 22. Buckelew SP, Murray SE, Hewett JE, et al.: Self-efficacy, pain, and physical activity among fibromyalgia subjects. Arthritis Care Res 1995, 8:43-50. 23. Moldofsky H, Scarisbrick P, England R, et al.: Musculoskeletal symptoms and nonREM sleep disturbance in patients with fibrositis syndrome and healthy subjects. Psychosom Med 1975, 34:341-351. 24. King AC, Oman RF, Brassington GS, et al.: Moderate-intensity exercise and self-rated quality of sleep in older adults: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 1997, 277:32-37. 25. North TC, McCullagh P, Tran VZ: Effect of exercise on depression. Exerc Sport Sci Rev 1990, 18:379-415. 26. Petruzzello SJ, Landers DM, Hatfield BD, et al.: A meta-analysis on the anxiety-reducing effects of acute and chronic exercise: Outcomes and mechanisms. Sports Med 1991, 11:43-82. 27. Mannerkorpi K, Nyberg B, Ahlmen M, et al.: Pool exercise combined with an education program for patients with fibromyalgia syndrome: A prospective, randomized study. J Rheumatol 2000, 27:2473-2481. 28. Clark SR, Jones KD, Burckhardt CS, et al.: Exercise for patients with fibromyalgia: risks versus benefits. Curr Rheumatol Rep 2001, 3:135-146. 29. Goldman JA: Hypermobility and deconditioning: important links to fibromyalgia/fibrositis. South Med J 1991, 84:1192-1196. 30. Karaaslan Y, Haznedaroglu S, Ozturk M: Joint hypermobility and primary fibromyalgia: a clinical enigma. J Rheumatol 2000, 27:1774-1776. 31. Van Santen M, Bolwijn P, Landewe R, et al.: High or low intensity aerobic fitness training in fibromyalgia: does it matter? J Rheumatol 2002, 29:582-587. * This is the only study that has tried to compare the effects of exercise that vary in intensity. Participants were randomized to 20 weeks of high- (70% of maximal heart rate for an unspecified period of time during 45 min on stationary bicycle, 3 times/wk) or low-intensity exercise (30 min of land-based aerobic exercise interspersed with flexibility and balance exercise, followed by 10 min of isometric muscle strengthening, 3 times/wk × 20 wks). 32. Jones KD, Clark SR: Individualizing the exercise prescription for persons with fibromyalgia. Rheum Dis Clin N Am 2002a, 28:419-436. * This review article includes practical tips for exercise prescription and a case study of exercise prescription for an individual with fibromyalgia. 33. Jones KD, Clark SR, Bennett RM: Prescribing exercise for people with fibromyalgia. AACN Clinical Issues 2002b, 13:277-293. * This review includes a tabulated summary of 27 exercise studies as well as practical tips for exercise prescription. 34. Schachter CL, Busch AJ, Peloso PM, et al.: Effects of short versus long bouts of aerobic exercise in sedentary women with fibromyalgia: a randomized, controlled trial. Phys Ther 2003, 83:340-358. * This is the first study to evaluate the effect of fractionating exercise into multiple bouts/day versus a single bout/day, in terms of outcome and exercise compliance. 35. Richards SCM, Scott DL: Prescribed exercise in people with fibromyalgia: parallel group randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2002, 325:185-188. * The exercise program in this study was conducted in community-based healthy living centers by personal trainers with no experience with clinical populations. 36. King S, Wessel J, Bhambhani Y, et al.: The effects of exercise and education, individually or combined, in women with fibromyalgia. J Rheumatol 2002, 29:2620-2627. 37. Wigers SH, Stiles TC, Vogel PA: Effects of aerobic exercise versus stress management treatment in fibromyalgia: a 4.5 year prospective study. Scand J Rheumatol 1996, 25:77-86. 38. Mannerkorpi K, Ahlmen M, Ekdahl C: Six- and 24-month follow-up of pool exercise therapy and education for patients with fibromyalgia. Scand J Rheumatol 2002, 31:306-310 © 2004 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins