http://www.americanchronicle.com/articles/viewArticle.asp?articleID=24334 Governors and Mayor Proclaim May as Multiple Chemical Sensitivity Awareness and Education Month Lourdes Salvador April 16, 2007 Governor Bill Ritter of Colorado, Governor Ted Strickland of Ohio, Mayor Josephus Eggelletion of Broward County Florida, Governor Jim Gibbons of Nevada, and Governor Christine Gregoire of Washington are among the first governors and mayors to proclaim the month of May 2007 as Multiple Chemical Sensitivity Awareness and Education Month. Multiple Chemical Sensitivities (MCS) is also known as Environmental Illness (EI), Toxic Injury (TI), Toxicant Induced Loss of Tolerance (TILT), and several other names. Originally identified in a 1989 multidisciplinary survey of 89 clinicians and researchers, and modified in 1999, top consensus criteria (Nethercott et al, 1993) for MCS define the condition as: 1. A chronic condition. 2. Symptoms recur reproducibly. 3. Symptoms recur in response to low levels of chemical exposure. 4. Symptoms occur when exposed to multiple unrelated chemicals. 5. Symptoms improve or resolve when trigger chemicals are removed. 6. Multiple organ systems are affected. Products that MCS patients react to include ANY quantity of exposures to pesticides, secondhand smoke, alcohol, fresh paint, scented products and perfumes, candles, fragrances, food preservatives, flavor enhancers, aerosols, tap water, cosmetics, personal care products, new carpets, petroleum products, formaldehyde, outdoor pollutants, newspaper ink, cleaning compounds, printing and office products, and other synthetically derived chemicals. Some also react to natural products that are highly concentrated such as natural orange cleaners due to high volatile organic compound and pesticide concentration. Symptoms can range from minor annoyances to life-threatening reactions. Prevalence The prevalence of MCS, based on self-reported symptoms by sample populations provides an estimate of 16% of the population who experience reactions to everyday chemicals (Gibson, 2005; Meggs et al, 1996). MCS affects more women than men. All education levels, income levels, and nationalities are affected equally. Etiology (Causation) There is no clear consensus as to what causes the symptoms of MCS. One of the first studies on MCS focused on possible long term potentiation in the hippocampus and neural sensitization as a central mechanism (Pall, 2003). Later studies examined the role of the inflammatory process and found that brain inflammation was correlated with symptoms of MCS (Pall, 2003). In 1999, Meggs proposed that MCS is caused by low molecular weight chemicals that bind to chemoreceptors on sensory nerve C-fibers leading to the release of inflammatory mediators (Meggs, 1999). Many observable and empirical, scientific facts can help identify MCS including SPECT scans and chemical encephalopathy, vitamin deficiencies, mineral deficiencies, excess amino acid deficiency, and disturbed lipid and carbohydrate metabolism (Rea et al, 2006; Ziem, 2001; Callendar et al, 1995; Heuser et al, 1994). McKeown-Eyssen et al (2004) studied 203 MCS sufferers and 162 controls and found that blood tests revealed that genetic differences relating to the body's detoxification processes were present more often in those with MCS than those without. Data showed that five genetic polymorphisms have a statistically significant role in determining MCS prevalence ( McKeown-Eyssen et al 2004). Each of these genes encode proteins that metabolize chemicals previously implicated in MCS, notably the organophosphorus pesticides (PON1 and PON2 genes) and the organic solvents (CYP2D, NAT1 and NAT2 genes) ( McKeown-Eyssen et al 2004). People with a ''high'' expression of two specific genes (CYP2D6 and NAT2) were 18 times more likely to have MCS than those without ( McKeown-Eyssen et al 2004). It was concluded that "a genetic predisposition for MCS may involve altered biotransformation of environmental chemicals" ( McKeown-Eyssen et al 2004). Haley found similar, confirmatory results with the PON1 gene in studies of the Gulf War syndrome veterans. A new study by Schnakenberg et al (2007) confirmed the genetic variation previously found by McKeown-Eyssen and Haley. A total of 521 unrelated individuals participated in the study. Genetic variants of four genes were analyzed: NAT2, GSTM1, GSTT1, and GSTP1. The researchers concluded that individuals who are NAT2 slow acetylators and those with homozygously deleted GSTM1 and GSTT1 genes are significantly more likely to develop chemical sensitivity (Schnackenberg et al, 2007). According to the study, the glutathione S-transferases act to inactivate chemicals, so people without these GSTM1 and GSTT1 genes are less able to metabolize environmental chemicals because "glutathione S-transferases play an important role in the detoxification of chemicals" (Schnackenberg et al, 2007). The deletion of another gene, the GSTP1 gene, leaves individuals more susceptible to developing these diseases, as lack of these genes means a loss of protection from oxidative stress (Schnackenberg, et al, 2007). The NO/ONOO- cycle is implicated by Pall as being a plausible etiology for Multiple Chemical Sensitivities (MCS), Fibromyalgia (FM), Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS), Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), and Gulf War Syndrome. Peroxynitrite (ONOO-) is oxidized from nitric oxide. Excess peroxynitrite depletes energy stores, which is perceived to cause extreme fatigue (Pall, ND). Of more interest to those who suffer from MCS is the fact that peroxynitrite breaks down the blood brain barrier and excess levels allow greater access to the brain (Pall, ND). This greatly increases the effects of chemicals on the brain. Essentially a non-MCS person has a barrier that protects the brain from damage from low-level chemical exposure, however a person who suffers from MCS has little or no barrier making the brain subject to increased damage and reactivity with minute exposures most people do not react to. The key effect of nitric oxide (NO) is that it inhibits cytochrome P-450 activity and slows degradation of hydrophobic organic chemicals (Pall, ND). This means that excess nitric oxide slows down the body's natural detoxification processes leaving MCS patients subject to the effects of chemical exposure longer than non-sufferers. Between a reduced blood-brain barrier and increased time to naturally detoxify the body MCS patients are subject to permanent and long-term brain and nervous system damage which includes toxic encephalopathy. "The only etiologic mechanism proposed for each of these is a vicious cycle mechanism involving elevated levels of nitric oxide and its oxidant product, peroxynitrite. This cycle may be initiated by a variety of diverse short-term stressors, including viral and bacterial infections, physical trauma, severe psychological stress, organic solvent exposure, and exposure to three classes of pesticides, organophosphorus / carbamate pesticides, organochlorine pesticides and pyrethroid pesticides). Each of these short-term stressors are known to be able to trigger responses that lead to increases in nitric oxide levels. Indeed, other initiating short-term stressors, including a protozoan infection, carbon monoxide exposure, thimerosal exposure and ciguatoxin exposure are also known or thought to act to increase nitric oxide levels, as well" (Pall, 2006). Regardless of cause, victims of MCS suffer isolation and require the support of family, friends, and medical providers. The month of May is designated to raise awareness of the condition and foster better understanding of its cause and prevention. With reasonable accommodations, victims can experience increased ability to work, attend school, shop, dine, go to church, and socialize. Accommodations are often simple and involve things such as opening windows, increasing ventilation, and substituting safer products that increase the safety of both the patient and others the general population. References Callender, TJ, et al. (1995). Evaluation of chronic neurological sequelae after acute pesticide exposure using SPECT brain scans. Journal Toxicology & Environmental Health. 41:275-284. Caress, S., & Steinemann, A. (2003). A Review of a Two-Phase Population Study of Multiple Chemical Sensitivity. Environmental Medicine. 111, 1490 - 1497. Davidoff, L. (1989). Multiple Chemical Sensitivities (MCS). The Amicus Journal. Winter. Ferrie, H. (October 2003). Multiple Chemical Sensitivity: Government and Medical Science Finally Recognize Crippling Effects of MCS. Vitality, Retrieved May 17, 2006, from http://www.vitalitymagazine.com/node/112 Gibson, P. (2005). Understanding & Accommodating People with Multiple Chemical Sensitivity in Everyday Living. Independent Living Research Utilization. Haley, RW, Billecke, S, & La Du, BN (1999). Association of low PON1 type Q (type A) arylesterase activity with neurologic symptom complexes in Gulf War veterans. Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology 157(3):227-33. Heuser, G, et al. (1994). Neurospect findings in patients exposed to neurotoxic chemicals. Toxicology & Industrial Health. 10:561-571. McKeown-Eyssen, G, Baines, C, Cole, D, Riley, N, Tyndale, R, Marshall, L, & Jazmaji, V (2004). Case-control study of genotypes in multiple chemical sensitivity: CYP2D6, NAT1, NAT2, PON1, PON2 and MTHFR]. International Journal of Epidemiology 33, 1-8. Meggs WJ, Dunn KA, Bloch RM, Goodman PE, Davidoff AL (1996). Prevalence and nature of allergy and chemical sensitivity in the general population. Archives of Environmental Health. Jul-Aug;51(4):275-82. Meggs, WJ (1999). Mechanisms of allergy and chemical sensitivity. Toxicology and Industrial Health. 15:3-4, 331-338. Nethercott J.R., Davidoff L.L., Curbow B., et al. (1993) Multiple Chemical Sensitivities Syndrome: Toward a Working Case Definition. Arch Environ Health, 48:19-26 Pall, M. (ND). Multiple Chemical Sensitivity: The End of Controversy. Washington State University School of Molecular Biosciences, Retrieved May 18, 2006, from: http://molecular.biosciences.wsu.edu/faculty/pall/pall_mcs.htm Pall, M (2006). The NO/ONOO- Cycle as the Cause of Fibromyalgia and Related Illnesses: Etiology, Explanation and Effective Therapy. Washington State University School of Molecular Biosciences. Pall, M (2003). Elevated nitric oxide/peroxynitrite theory of multiple chemical sensitivity: central role of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors in the sensitivity mechanism. Environmental Health Perspectives. 111:12, 1461-1464. Pall, M. (2001). Multiple Chemical Sensitivity - The End of Controversy. Washington State University, School of Molecular Biosciences, Retrieved May 17, 2006, from http://molecular.biosciences.wsu.edu/faculty/pall/pall_mcs.htm Schnackenberg,E. et al (2007). A cross-sectional study of self-reported chemical-related sensitivity is association with gene variations of drug-metabolizing enzymes. Environmental Health. Ziem, G (2001). Medical Evaluation and Treatment of Patients with Chemical Injury and Sensitivity. National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences. Disclaimer This is for informational purposes and is not intended to replace the examination, diagnosis and treatment of a licensed physician and no such claims are inferred. The author and publisher will not be responsible for misuse of this information and recommend consulting with a doctor qualified to diagnose MCS if it is suspected. About the Author Lourdes Salvador is a writer and social advocate based in Hawaii. She is the president of MCS America and a featured monthly writer for MCS America News at www.mcs-america.org. She is a passionate advocate for the homeless, working with the local governor to open new shelters and provide services to the homeless based on a presentation of her ideas to the governor. That passion soon turned to advocacy and activism for victims of multiple chemical sensitivity. For more information about Lourdes and her advocacy work, please visit: www.mcs-america.org, www.thetruthaboutmcs.blogspot.com, and www.cafepress.com/mcsamerica. Copyrighted © 2007 Lourdes Salvador